← Back to all posts

The Prestige Trap

I get asked this question more than any other: "What is my chance of getting into an Ivy?" I understand the question. I've asked it of myself, in my own way, at every stage of my education. But it's the wrong question to lead with.

The right questions sound different. Is this school the right fit? Will I thrive there? Can I afford it, and can I graduate without a mountain of debt?

This first blog post is about why prestige is such a magnetic idea, why the data doesn't back it up, and what actually predicts whether a student will thrive in college.

The Data Doesn't Say What You Think It Says

In his 2015 book, Where You Go Is Not Who You'll Be, journalist Frank Bruni points out that in 2014, the top 10 corporations by revenue in the United States were led by CEOs whose undergraduate degrees came from large public universities, with only one Ivy (Dartmouth) on the list. Bruni also pushes back on the "recent presidents attended Ivies" argument, noting that if you look beyond the most recent presidents, many came from non-elite institutions.

When families hear this for the first time, there is usually a long pause.

A well-known study by economists Stacy Dale and Alan Krueger found that students who were accepted to selective colleges but chose to attend less selective ones earned about the same as their peers over their careers. The takeaway isn't that selective schools don't matter. It's that the traits that got a student admitted, like ambition, curiosity, work ethic, etc., are the same traits that drive success wherever they enroll.

Research from Opportunity Insights, led by Harvard economist Raj Chetty, has similarly found that many mid-tier public universities produce stronger economic mobility for their students than most Ivy League schools do.

Bottom line: Ivy or bust doesn't actually match where many top leaders come from.

The Selectivity Numbers Are a Marketing Machine

Bruni describes what he calls "adjusted acceptance rates," where selective schools intentionally drive up applications in order to shrink their acceptance rates, using the resulting single-digit numbers as a PR tool. A 4% admit rate is as much a marketing achievement as it is a quality signal. Bruni also notes that legacies get a large admissions boost, and that wealthy families are more likely to be accepted.

As Bruni puts it, "chasing prestige is driven by false scarcity, unreliable rankings, and systemic advantages," and it pushes families to spend exorbitant amounts of money in pursuit of a brand name.

It took me years of being inside the system to see this clearly.

Rankings Aren't What Families Think

The U.S. News and World Report college rankings are the most widely used in the country. According to their own published methodology, part of the score comes from a subjective reputation survey sent to educators and administrators at other schools. Some survey takers even say they feel uncomfortable filling out the survey because they don't know other campuses well enough. U.S. News does take into account factors like graduation rates, student-faculty ratios, and retention rates, but many ranking systems, U.S. News included, tend to ignore the criteria that matter most to an applicant, like specific academic offerings, social climate, international opportunities, and career placement rates.

Between 2022 and 2023, several elite law and medical schools, including Yale Law, Harvard Law, Stanford Law, and Columbia, publicly withdrew from the U.S. News rankings, citing concerns with the methodology, as reported by Reuters and The New York Times.

Rankings can tell you which school has the strongest reputation among administrators, but they won't tell you which school is right for you.

The Access Question

As Bruni writes, "admission to an Ivy is a badge of privilege." Roughly 75% of students at the 200 most highly rated colleges in the U.S. come from families in the top quartile of incomes.

I sat with this number for a long time when I first read it. It is part of why I built Candlelight the way I did.

We can't conclude that admit rates are measuring the raw talent of the applicant pool. The data shows that admit rates are measuring who had access to prep for the pool in the first place.

The Well-Rounded Trap

It is a common assumption that selective schools are looking for a "well-rounded" student with a long and varied activities list. However, the well-rounded student has become too common and too easy to achieve. Colleges are looking to create a well-rounded class rather than admit hundreds of well-rounded individual students.

What is harder to find, and what selective schools actually value, is a student who is hyperfocused and passionate about one thing.

Consider two students interested in public health. One has done social justice activism, volunteered at a local hospital, and completed a research project on a broad health topic. The other has dabbled in public health, sings in choir, and volunteers at a food bank. Both students look "well-rounded" on paper. But one of them tells a story a reader can remember.

“Stop caring about trying to be what other people want, because then you won't know what you want later on.”

There is a line from my college counseling coursework that I come back to often, and it is the line above. The strongest applications I have read, both as a UC scholarship essay reviewer and as a consultant, come from students who leaned into one thing they actually care about and let the rest of their story build around it.

What Actually Matters More Than Prestige

There are certain fit criteria that will predict thriving: Cost, Major, Location, and Size. Families should be asking, "Would _____ be happy, supported, and challenged here?"

Bruni ends the first chapter of Where You Go Is Not Who You'll Be with a question I think about often: "Does a prestigious college make you successful in life? Or do you do that for yourself?"

What This Blog Will Do About It

I believe in fit over rankings, authenticity over polish, and putting the student at the center of the application process.

In the next few posts, I'll go more into fit criteria, balanced list building, and what a meaningful and productive summer actually looks like.

And to the parents, remember: your kid's life is not decided by the sticker on the back windshield.

From my desk to yours,

Heather

Sources

Frank Bruni, Where You Go Is Not Who You'll Be: An Antidote to the College Admissions Mania (Grand Central Publishing, 2015). Stacy Dale and Alan Krueger, "Estimating the Payoff to Attending a More Selective College," Quarterly Journal of Economics (2002); NBER Working Paper 17159 (2011). Raj Chetty et al., "Mobility Report Cards: The Role of Colleges in Intergenerational Mobility," Opportunity Insights, opportunityinsights.org. U.S. News and World Report ranking methodology, usnews.com. Reuters and The New York Times reporting on law and medical school withdrawals from U.S. News rankings, 2022 to 2023.

Heather Wood

Heather Wood is the founder of Candlelight College Consulting. A former UC scholarship essay reviewer and first-generation college graduate, she has helped hundreds of students find their voice and put their best application forward.